Virginia Supreme Court Rules in Favor of YMCA, Dismisses Cases

What is in this article?:

The Virginia Supreme Court ruled in favor of a YMCA and against a for-profit club organization in Charlottesville, VA, that had attempted to thwart the building of a local YMCA in a city park.

Continued on next page...

The for-profit group claimed that the city and county violated the Virginia Public Procurement Act, which requires the government to seek bids on projects. Albemarle County and the city of Charlottesville donated $2.03 million and $1.25 million, respectively, to the Piedmont Family YMCA, Charlottesville, to build a Y in a city park. Neither the city nor the county allowed bids from private clubs, the for-profit group claimed.

However, Goodwyn wrote that Albemarle County Board of Supervisors had the right to enter into the agreement with the YMCA.

"The fitness clubs are strangers to the board's negotiations with the YMCA, including its decision to make a $2.03 million payment to the YMCA and enter into the use agreement," Goodwyn wrote. "Although ACAC alleges that it pays taxes in Albemarle County, it is not seeking to protect the interests of the taxpayers of Albemarle County and thus does not allege a justiciable controversy."

Furthermore, according to Goodwyn's opinion, the for-profit group filed the lawsuits to protect its own interests.

"ACAC did not institute its action for the benefit of taxpayers and others similarly situated," Goodwyn wrote. "Nor has it alleged that the $2.03 million payment to the YMCA will impose an illegal tax burden or will otherwise injuriously affect the taxpayers of the county. To the contrary, ACAC seeks to protect its own interests as a business that provides fitness services."

Goodwyn also wrote that the for-profit clubs were attempting to create rights they did not have.

"The fitness clubs did not seek to bid on the lease, did not protest the council's limitation to construction and operation of a non-profit facility, and did not otherwise seek a determination from the council as to whether they could submit a bid on the lease," Goodwyn wrote.

Discuss this Article 1

Linda Mitchell (not verified)
on Feb 11, 2013

Having successfully fought this fight in 2001 in our own community, we at the Newtown Athletic Club understand very well the difficulty encountered when dealing with both the YMCA and the local governments. We support ACAC and the other for profit clubs in their attempt to thwart this move on the part of the local government, especially since the for profit clubs were never brought into the conversation about this proposed building from the start. Without intimate knowledge of the details of this case, it sounds to us that the lawyers for the YMCA utilized arguments to sway the judge that employed assumptions about the motives of the for-profit clubs that were unfair, ie., that they were not looking out for the interests of the taxpayers, but only their own. We stand behind you ACAC 100 percent and are are sorry to hear that this ruling went against you.

Please or Register to post comments.

Keep up with the latest news with our weekly e-newsletter.

Current Issue
Club Info and News

Connect With Us