Virginia Supreme Court Rules in Favor of YMCA, Dismisses Cases

What is in this article?:

The Virginia Supreme Court ruled in favor of a YMCA and against a for-profit club organization in Charlottesville, VA, that had attempted to thwart the building of a local YMCA in a city park.

The Virginia Supreme Court ruled in favor of a YMCA and against a for-profit club organization in Charlottesville, VA, that had attempted to thwart the building of a local YMCA in a city park.

The for-profit club organization, Charlottesville Area Fitness Club Operators Association, includes ACAC Fitness and Wellness Centers and Gym Quest Inc., a Gold's Gym franchisee.

"ACAC was disappointed by the ruling, but we appreciate that the court saw fit to hear the case," Christine Thalwitz, director of communications and research for ACAC Fitness and Wellness Centers, told Club Industry. "We respect their decision and look forward to moving ahead."

On Thursday, the Virginia Supreme Court vacated and dismissed two judgments entered by the circuit courts of the city of Charlottesville and Albemarle County. The two cases were Charlottesville Area Fitness Club Operators Association vs. Albemarle County Board of Supervisors and Charlottesville Area Fitness Club Operators Association vs. Charlottesville City Council. Judges ruled in favor of the county in November 2010 and ruled in favor of the city in April 2011 before the decisions were appealed.

Justice S. Bernard Goodwyn wrote the opinion for the Virginia Supreme Court.

"Because we are of the opinion that none of the claims asserted in the declaratory judgment actions presents a justiciable controversy, we will vacate the judgments of the circuit courts and dismiss the declaratory judgment actions because the circuit courts did not have authority to exercise jurisdiction," Goodwyn wrote.

Kurt Krueger, chairman of the Piedmont Family YMCA, told local media it was "a good day for the Y" and planned to proceed with the construction of the Y.

Discuss this Article 1

Linda Mitchell (not verified)
on Feb 11, 2013

Having successfully fought this fight in 2001 in our own community, we at the Newtown Athletic Club understand very well the difficulty encountered when dealing with both the YMCA and the local governments. We support ACAC and the other for profit clubs in their attempt to thwart this move on the part of the local government, especially since the for profit clubs were never brought into the conversation about this proposed building from the start. Without intimate knowledge of the details of this case, it sounds to us that the lawyers for the YMCA utilized arguments to sway the judge that employed assumptions about the motives of the for-profit clubs that were unfair, ie., that they were not looking out for the interests of the taxpayers, but only their own. We stand behind you ACAC 100 percent and are are sorry to hear that this ruling went against you.

Please or Register to post comments.

Keep up with the latest news with our weekly e-newsletter.

Current Issue
Club Info and News

Connect With Us