Smith Machine Lawsuit Ends with $14.4 Million Decision

Article Tools




Interact With Us



Best of 2011

Top Stories of 2011

The most popular stories of 2011. Did your favorites make our list?

View our Top 12 list here

Resource Center

Buyers Guide

Find industry businesses by product or service categories, view company profiles and more.

View our Buyers Guide

Club Industry Trade Show

Club Industry Show and Conference, held each October, is the premier event for fitness and wellness professionals. Find out more about Exhibitors, Events, and Education.

View our Trade Show

Industry Events & Trade Shows

The industry-wide calendar features listings for educational events, trade shows and more.

View our Events Calendar

Classifieds

View classified ads for health club equipment and services, plus business opportunities and job postings.

View Classifieds

Current Issue

Read stories from the latest print issue of Club Industry magazine.

View the Current Issue

E-Newsletter Signup

Breaking news on the industry, people on the move, mergers and acquisitions and much more. Delivered weekly.

A lawsuit involving Flex Equipment Co. Inc. and Gold's Gym has ended in a jury awarding the plaintiff $14.4 million. The jury determined that the plaintiff in the case, Harold Leon Bostick, was injured while doing squats on a Flex Smith machine at a Venice, CA, Gold's Gym in January 2001. The weight-lifting bar on the machine crushed Bostick's spine. He is now a quadriplegic.

Gold's Gym settled out of court with the plaintiff for $7.3 million prior to the jury's decision. Because Gold's Gym has already agreed to pay $7.3 million of the $14.4 million award, Flex Equipment is responsible for paying the remaining $7.1 million.

Smith, Chapman & Campbell, the Santa Ana, CA, law firm that handled the case for Bostick, plans to appeal the offset amount required of Flex Equipment. Flex Equipment's insurance company will make a decision this fall about whether to appeal the decision, said Mark Nalley, president of Flex Equipment.

The Flex Smith machine in question was equipped with a “dynamic stop” in addition to a “dead stop,” said Nalley. Many manufacturers producing Smith machines only incorporate a dynamic stop, while some also have an “adjustable stop,” he said. Adjustable stops allow users to determine the stopping point for the weights.

However, independent studies have shown that adjustable stops were largely not deployed, and in fact, in some instances, had been removed by clubs, Nalley said. For that reason, Flex Equipment incorporated a “dead stop” in its machine.

Nalley says the 21-inch height of the dead stop is sufficient to prevent injury. However, Steve Smith, principal at Smith, Chapman & Campbell, said that the height of the dead stop on the Flex Smith machine was too low at 21 inches. Instead, he said that experts that testified in the case said a stop should be no lower than 28 inches.

“There are all kinds of Smith machines out there that are dangerous,” Smith said. “Machines without adjustable safety stops are inherently dangerous. There is no reason a bar should go below a 28-inch height. It's not just Flex Smith machines.”

Smith suggested that club owners with Flex Smith machines contact Flex Equipment to change the dead stop to 28 inches off the ground and ensure that all other Smith machines currently on their premises or purchased in the future have stops of 28 inches.

The original award was $16.3 million, but the jury decreased that amount by 10 percent due to Bostick's negligence, although the jury did not state what they saw as Bostick's negligence. However, Nalley said that the case involved a lifter who attempted to lift too much weight. As a result, his quadriceps tore, which caused him to fall, resulting in paralysis, Nalley contended.

“The effect of this decision impacts the entire industry,” Nalley said about the lawsuit. “Unfortunately, this is another case and point that our society and legal system refuses to hold individuals responsible for their poor choices and/or actions.”

Smith advises gym owners to take responsibility for overseeing the safety of their equipment rather than relying solely on manufacturers to inspect equipment.

“As an owner, they are required to know what is safe for their users and users expect them to have more knowledge in that area than the user has,” said Smith.

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2012 Penton Media Inc.

Sponsored Content

Cardio and Strength Trends
Sponsored by Life Fitness

Core Strength Conditioning
Sponsored by The AB Coaster Company

Group Exercise
Sponsored by LesMills

Technology Resource Center
Sponsored by ABC Financial

Videos

1st Annual Fitness Industry Summit 2011: Introduction

Jay Del Vecchio, World Instructor Training Schools President and CEO

Star Trac 2012 Photo Shoot: Behind the Scenes

Making of Star Trac Lifestyle Images Video.

Elevation Series iPod Compatibility

Watch the newest informative video from Life Fitness.



More Video

E-Newsletter

Newsbeat

Delivered once a week, this timely e-newsletter features breaking news, people on the move, mergers and acquisitions, supplier news, industry trends and more.

Subscribe

Most Popular

Most Recent

Insights into what high-level club executives think about their business and industry trends.

View Executive Insights

Practical Internet strategies to help you build customer relationships, increase revenues and lower costs.

View Web Savvy

In This Issue: May 2012 View All Past Issues

Cover Story

The Business of Corporate Fitness

Focusing on the corporate fitness market can present a revenue opportunity.



View the full issue
| View the digital edition

Subscribe To Club Industry Magazine

In Print and Online

Subscribe today to get the news you need and information you want from our print or digital edition as well as in our e-newsletters.

Subscribe Today!